Premium
The potential of a surface pre‐reacted glass root canal dressing for treating apical periodontitis in rats
Author(s) -
Xiong B.,
Shirai K.,
Matsumoto K.,
Abiko Y.,
Furuichi Y.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international endodontic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.988
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1365-2591
pISSN - 0143-2885
DOI - 10.1111/iej.13414
Subject(s) - dentistry , sodium hypochlorite , molar , haematoxylin , root canal , glass ionomer cement , medicine , calcium hydroxide , cementum , pulp (tooth) , significant difference , staining , chemistry , dentin , pathology , organic chemistry
Abstract Aim To evaluate the efficacy of a prototype root canal dressing containing surface pre‐reacted glass–ionomer (S‐PRG) fillers on repairing induced periapical lesions in a rat model. Calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH) 2 ] was applied as a comparison in the healing process. Methodology The pulp chambers of the maxillary first molars in 64 male Wistar rats aged 16 weeks were opened to induce periapical lesions. After 28 days, the mesial canal of each tooth was prepared, irrigated with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite only (control group: irrigation) or followed by the respective dressing [Ca(OH) 2 group, irrigation + Ca(OH) 2 ; S‐PRG group, irrigation + S‐PRG] and restored with composite resin for 3 or 7 days (10/group). Four rats with healthy molars were used as blank controls. Descriptive analysis of the periapical radiographs, haematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemical observation was performed 3 and 7 days after treatment. The periapical grey value, CD68 macrophages and osteoclasts (cathepsin‐K) were quantified and statistically analysed with Tukey’s honest significant difference test. A significant difference was achieved when P values were <0.05. Results S‐PRG and Ca(OH) 2 dressings were associated with increased periapical grey values and inhibited osteoclast activity at 3 and 7 days; a significant difference in radiographic results and the number of osteoclasts was obtained at 3 and 7 days compared with the control group ( P < 0.05). Reparative tissue was observed histologically in the space of the periapical resorbed necrotic area after S‐PRG and Ca(OH) 2 treatment for 3 and 7 days. The number of macrophages was significantly decreased at 3 and 7 days in the S‐PRG and Ca(OH) 2 specimens when compared with the controls ( P < 0.05). Conclusions In a rat experimental model, the S‐PRG root canal dressing was comparable to Ca(OH) 2 in promoting the healing of experimentally induced periapical lesions. S‐PRG paste has the potential to be used as an alternative intracanal dressing in teeth with apical periodontitis.