Premium
Canal shaping with a reciprocating system is easy to learn
Author(s) -
Muñoz E.,
Forner L.,
Garcet S.,
RodríguezLozano F. J.,
Llena C.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
international endodontic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.988
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1365-2591
pISSN - 0143-2885
DOI - 10.1111/iej.13111
Subject(s) - reciprocating motion , root canal , instrumentation (computer programming) , endodontics , dentistry , significant difference , orthodontics , mathematics , computer science , medicine , statistics , artificial intelligence , bearing (navigation) , operating system
Aim To assess progressive learning of root canal shaping in order to define the number of simulated canals in resin blocks needed to reach a level of learning beyond which no further improvement in performance is observed. Methodology A total of 216 simulated canals in resin blocks were instrumented by 18 operators without experience in Endodontics and by 18 Endodontists. The R25 file of the Reciproc system (VDW, Munich, Germany) was used to prepare the canals. The blocks were photographed before and after instrumentation. An analysis was made of the variations in the dimensions of the canals at 6 locations and of the instrumentation time. A Student's t ‐test was used to analyse the data ( P < 0.05). Results The group without experience were associated with significant differences in instrumentation time between the first canal and the subsequent canals ( P < 0.05) but differences in canal dimensions were not significant ( P > 0.05). In the group with experience, the instrumentation time did not differ significantly after the fifth canal, and no significant variations in canal dimensions were observed ( P > 0.05). Conclusions When conducting studies on root canal shaping or educating students with new instruments, a simulated canal sample size of 6 was appropriate to achieve competence.