z-logo
Premium
Dentine decalcification and smear layer removal by different ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and 1‐hydroxyethane‐1,1‐diphosphonic acid species
Author(s) -
Deari S.,
Mohn D.,
Zehnder M.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
international endodontic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.988
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1365-2591
pISSN - 0143-2885
DOI - 10.1111/iej.12987
Subject(s) - ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid , smear layer , bone decalcification , chemistry , chelation , dissolution , calcium , nuclear chemistry , citric acid , fluoride , solubility , molar , molar concentration , inorganic chemistry , root canal , dentistry , biochemistry , medicine , organic chemistry
Aim To compare solutions of di‐ and tetrasodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid ( EDTA ) and 1‐hydroxyethane‐1,1‐diphosphonic acid ( HEDP ) regarding their ability to solubilize calcium from dentine and remove smear layer. Methodology Solutions with a molarity corresponding to that of 17% Na 2 EDTA ( pH adjusted to 8.5) were prepared by dissolving Na 2 and Na 4 salts of HEDP (etidronate), or Na 4 EDTA in deionized water. Standardized root dentine discs covered by a smear layer were prepared from human third molars. These discs ( n  =   10 per group) were immersed in test solutions or phosphate‐buffered saline for 1 min. The dissolved Ca 2+ was determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy, apparently opened dentinal tubules by laser scanning microscopy and automated image analysis. Ca 2+ values were compared between groups by parametric, tubular areas by nonparametric methods, α = 0.05. Results Solutions prepared from the tetrasodium salts were alkaline ( pH 11.3–11.4), whilst counterparts made from the disodium salts were acidic. The EDTA solutions dissolved more calcium than the HEDP counterparts ( P  <   0.05); solutions prepared with the disodium salts dissolved more calcium than those made from the tetrasodium salts ( P  <   0.05). There was a high correlation between dissolved calcium and the apparently opened tubular areas (Spearman's ρ = 0.81). Differences between groups regarding opened tubules were similar to those observed regarding the Ca 2+ values, with a slightly reduced discerning power due to high variance. Conclusion Calcium chelation and thus smear layer removal by EDTA and HEDP are influenced by pH .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom