Premium
Effect of curing conditions on physical and chemical properties of MTA+
Author(s) -
Zarra T.,
Lambrianidis T.,
Vasiliadis L.,
Gogos C.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
international endodontic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.988
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1365-2591
pISSN - 0143-2885
DOI - 10.1111/iej.12938
Subject(s) - materials science , saline , solubility , scanning electron microscope , curing (chemistry) , surface roughness , humidity , nuclear chemistry , composite material , dentistry , chemistry , medicine , anesthesia , physics , organic chemistry , thermodynamics
Aim To evaluate setting time, pH, solubility and surface roughness of MTA+ and ProRoot MTA and characterize their hydration under several curing conditions. Methodology Specimens were prepared to evaluate setting time ( n = 6 for each group, specimen dimensions 10 × 8 × 5 mm), solubility ( n = 6 for each group, specimen dimension 20 mm in diameter and 1.5 mm thick) after 1 and 28 days, pH ( n = 10 for each group, specimen dimensions 10 mm in diameter and 1 mm thick) after 1, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days and surface roughness ( n = 10 for each group, specimen dimensions 4 mm in diameter and 3 mm high) after 28 days when cements were cured at 95% humidity or immersed in saline or HBSS at 37 °C. The powder and liquid were mechanically mixed by an amalgamator. The set materials were characterized using X‐ray diffraction analysis, scanning electron microscopy and X‐ray energy‐dispersive analysis. Statistical comparisons were employed using one‐way anova . The level of significance was set at P = 0.05. Results Setting time was significantly shorter when cements were cured at 95% humidity compared to those in saline ( P < 0.001) and HBSS ( P < 0.001). Setting time of MTA+ was significantly shorter than that of ProRoot MTA ( P < 0.001), which had a significantly higher pH than MTA+ ( P < 0.05) for all periods and immersion liquids. After immersion in saline, MTA+ was significantly less soluble than ProRoot MTA ( P < 0.001); when immersed in HBSS, no significant difference was found ( P = 1.00). The surface roughness of both cements was affected when exposed to HBSS ( P < 0.001 for both cements) and saline ( P < 0.001 for both cements). Storage in HBSS created a homogenous surface; incubation in saline or humidity created a biphasic surface. The main crystalline phases in both cements were tricalcium silicate, bismuth oxide and calcium hydroxide. Conclusions MTA+ had a shorter setting time than ProRoot MTA, promoted lower pH and had lower solubility in saline. Curing conditions affected the surface roughness and microstructure of the cements.