Premium
Efficacy of chlorhexidine as a final irrigant in one‐visit root canal treatment: a prospective comparative study
Author(s) -
Miçooğulları Kurt S.,
Çalışkan M. K.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
international endodontic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.988
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1365-2591
pISSN - 0143-2885
DOI - 10.1111/iej.12931
Subject(s) - medicine , dentistry , root canal , chlorhexidine , postoperative pain , randomized controlled trial , surgery
Aim To evaluate postoperative pain and radiographic evidence of periapical healing in teeth with apical periodontitis treated in one visit with an additional final irrigation using 2% chlorhexidine ( CHX ) and to compare the results with conventional two‐visit root canal treatment ( RCT ) with an intracanal calcium hydroxide ( CH ) dressing as a control group. Methodology Ninety asymptomatic maxillary anterior teeth with periapical lesions were treated by a single operator. Root canals were prepared using the step‐back technique with manual instrumentation with 2.5% Na OC l and 5% EDTA as irrigants. Half of the teeth were randomly assigned to the one‐visit ( OV ) group and received an additional final rinse with 2% CHX before canal filling. The other teeth were treated in two visits ( TV ) with a CH paste made by mixing CH powder and distilled water as an interappointment dressing. All patients were recalled and investigated clinically and radiographically for 24 months. Postoperative pain at 24–48 h and changes in apical bone density indicating radiographic healing were evaluated statistically using the Mann–Whitney U ‐test followed by the Friedman and the Wilcoxon tests (α = 0.05). Results There were no significant differences between two groups regarding the incidence of postoperative pain at 24 h ( OV group 50% no pain, 47.6% mild, 2.4% moderate pain/ TV group 55% no pain, 42.5% mild, 2.5% moderate pain) and at 48 h ( OV group 95% no pain, 5% mild pain/ TV group 98% no pain, 2% mild pain). None of the patients reported severe postoperative pain, swelling and/or flare‐ups during the follow‐up period. There was no significant difference in the radiographic healing rates ( OV group 97.6% PAI 1 and/or PAI 2 and 2.4% PAI 3/ TV group 95% PAI 1 and/or PAI 2 and 5% PAI 3; P > 0.05). Conclusion Both groups provided favourable and similar postoperative pain and periapical healing rates at 24 months. Thus, one‐visit RCT with a final rinse with 2% CHX is an acceptable alternative to two‐visit RCT with CH as temporary dressing in maxillary anterior teeth.