Premium
The effect of mixing method on tricalcium silicate‐based cement
Author(s) -
Duque J. A.,
Fernandes S. L.,
Bubola J. P.,
Duarte M. A. H.,
Camilleri J.,
Marciano M. A.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
international endodontic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.988
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1365-2591
pISSN - 0143-2885
DOI - 10.1111/iej.12774
Subject(s) - mixing (physics) , cement , silicate , materials science , mineralogy , dentistry , geology , composite material , chemical engineering , medicine , engineering , physics , quantum mechanics
Aim To evaluate the effect of three methods of mixing on the physical and chemical properties of tricalcium silicate‐based cements. Methodology The materials evaluated were MTA Angelus and Portland cement with 20% zirconium oxide (PC‐20‐Zr). The cements were mixed using a 3 : 1 powder‐to‐liquid ratio. The mixing methods were manual (m), trituration (tr) and ultrasonic (us) activation. The materials were characterized by means of scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy. Flowability was analysed according to ANSI/ADA 57/2012. Initial and final setting times were assessed following ASTM C266/08. Volume change was evaluated using a micro‐CT volumetric method. Solubility was analysed according to ADA 57/2012. pH and calcium ion release were measured after 3, 24, 72 and 168 h. Statistical analysis was performed using two‐way analysis of variance. The level of significance was set at P = 0.05. Results The SEM analysis revealed that ultrasonic activation was associated with a homogeneous distribution of particles. Flowability, volume change and initial setting time were not influenced by the mixing method ( P > 0.05). Solubility was influenced by the mixing method ( P < 0.05). For pH, at 168 h, significant differences were found between MTA‐m and PC‐20‐Zr‐m ( P < 0.05). For calcium ion release, PC‐20‐Zr‐tr had higher values than MTA‐m at 3 h, and MTA‐tr had higher values than PC‐20‐Zr‐m at 168 h ( P < 0.05). Conclusions The ultrasonic and trituration methods led to higher calcium ion release and pH compared with manual mixing for all cements, whilst the ultrasonic method produced smaller particles for the PC‐20‐Zr cement. Flow, setting times and volume change were not influenced by the mixing method used; however, it did have an impact on solubility.