Premium
Influence of working length and apical preparation size on apical bacterial extrusion during reciprocating instrumentation
Author(s) -
Teixeira J. M. S.,
Cunha F. M.,
Jesus R. O.,
Silva E. J. N. L.,
Fidel S. R.,
Sassone L. M.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
international endodontic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.988
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1365-2591
pISSN - 0143-2885
DOI - 10.1111/iej.12357
Subject(s) - reciprocating motion , instrumentation (computer programming) , extrusion , materials science , dentistry , medicine , composite material , computer science , bearing (navigation) , artificial intelligence , operating system
Aim To evaluate the influence of reciprocating single‐file instrumentation with different working lengths ( WL ) and apical preparation sizes on apical bacterial extrusion. Methodology Sixty‐eight human single‐rooted pre‐molars were used. Conventional access cavities were prepared, and the root canals were contaminated with an E nterococcus faecalis suspension and incubated at 37°C for 30 days. Teeth were then divided into four groups of 15 specimens each (Reciproc size 25, .08 taper and Reciproc size 40, .06 taper instruments were used at the foramen; Reciproc size 25, .08 taper and Reciproc size 40, .06 taper instruments were used 1 mm short of the foramen). Positive and negative controls consisted of four infected and four uninfected pre‐molars that were instrumented according to each experimental group. Bacteria extruded from the apical foramen during instrumentation were collected into vials containing 0.9% NaCl. The microbiological samples were then incubated in a brain–heart agar medium for 24 h. The resulting bacterial titre, in colony‐forming units ( CFU ) per mL, was determined, and these data were analysed using a Wilcoxon matched‐pairs signed rank test and a Kruskal–Wallis H‐test. The level of significance was set at α = 0.05. Results No growth was observed in the negative control group. All positive controls demonstrated bacterial growth after the experimental time interval. No significant difference was found in the number of CFU amongst all experimental groups ( P = 0.95). Conclusions This study showed that the WL and the apical preparation size did not have a significant effect on bacterial extrusion when performing reciprocating instrumentation.