Premium
Effect of solvents on the accuracy of the Mini Root ZX apex locator
Author(s) -
Er O.,
Uzun O.,
Ustun Y.,
Canakcı B. C.,
Yalpı F.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
international endodontic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.988
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1365-2591
pISSN - 0143-2885
DOI - 10.1111/iej.12111
Subject(s) - root canal , zinc oxide eugenol , dentistry , mathematics , gutta percha , materials science , chemistry , medicine
Aim To evaluate ex vivo, the effects of three solvents on the accuracy of a contemporary electronic root canal length measurement device ( ERCLMD ), the Mini Root ZX . Methodology The actual working length ( AWL ) of 56 extracted maxillary incisor teeth were measured with an ERCLMD . All root canals were prepared with the ProTaper system to AWL . Of them, 20 were filled with gutta‐percha and a resin‐based sealer (Group A), 20 with gutta‐percha and a zinc oxide/eugenol‐based sealer (Group B), and 16 roots were used as the control group (Group C). Removal of the root filling and repreparation processes were performed using the ProTaper system. Guttasolv and Resosolv were used as the solvents in Group A and Guttasolv and Endosolv E in Group B. After the removal of the root fillings had been achieved, the same ERCLMD was used to measure the working length ( WL ). Differences between AWL and WL measurements were analysed by paired t ‐test, and the accuracy of ERCLMD was assessed using chi‐squared tests. Results There were significant differences between AWL and WL measurements in subgroups A2 (Resosolv group) and B2 (Endosolv E group). In these subgroups, WL was shorter than AWL ( P < 0.05). Also, the accuracy of the Resosolv group was significantly lower than the others ( P < 0.05) at a ±0.5 mm margin of error. Conclusions Removing root fillings may require use of a solvent. In these cases, ERCLMD s may exhibit a lower accuracy, thus operators must exercise additional care when measuring the working length using ERCLMD s.