Premium
Systematic review of organisation‐wide, trauma‐informed care models in out‐of‐home care (Oo HC ) settings
Author(s) -
Bailey Cate,
Klas Anna,
Cox Rachael,
Bergmeier Heidi,
Avery Julie,
Skouteris Helen
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
health and social care in the community
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.984
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1365-2524
pISSN - 0966-0410
DOI - 10.1111/hsc.12621
Subject(s) - neglect , burnout , attachment theory , systematic review , psychology , medicine , child abuse , nursing , clinical psychology , suicide prevention , medline , poison control , political science , medical emergency , law
Trauma in early childhood has been shown to adversely affect children's social, emotional, and physical development. Children living in out‐of‐home care (Oo HC ) have better outcomes when care providers are present for children, physically, psychologically, and emotionally. Unfortunately, the high turnover of out‐of‐home carers, due to vicarious trauma (frequently resulting in burnout and exhaustion) can result in a child's trauma being re‐enacted during their placement in Oo HC . Organisation‐wide therapeutic care models (encompassing the whole organisation, from the CEO to all workers including administration staff) that are trauma‐informed have been developed to respond to the complex issues of abuse and neglect experienced by children who have been placed in OoHC. These models incorporate a range of therapeutic techniques, and provide an overarching approach and common language that is employed across all levels of the organisation. The aim of this study was to investigate the current empirical evidence for organisation‐wide, trauma‐informed therapeutic care models in Oo HC . A systematic review searching leading databases was conducted for evidence of organisation‐wide, trauma‐informed, out‐of‐home care studies, between 2002 and 2017. Seven articles were identified covering three organisational models. Three of the articles assessed the Attachment Regulation and Competency framework ( ARC ), one study assessed the Children and Residential Experiences programme ( CARE ), and three studies assessed The Sanctuary Model. Risk of bias was high in six of the seven studies. Only limited information was provided on the effectiveness of the models identified through this systematic review, although the evidence did suggest that trauma‐informed care models may have significantly positive outcomes for children in Oo HC . Future research should focus on evaluating components of trauma‐informed care models and assessing the efficacy of the various organisational care models currently available.