Premium
Equity in social care for people with intellectual disabilities? A cross‐sectional study examining the distribution of social care funding across local authorities in England
Author(s) -
Chinn Deborah,
Levitan Tony,
Murrells Trevor
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
health and social care in the community
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.984
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1365-2524
pISSN - 0966-0410
DOI - 10.1111/hsc.12378
Subject(s) - rurality , equity (law) , social deprivation , social welfare , psychological intervention , inequality , intellectual disability , population , poverty , socioeconomic status , distribution (mathematics) , economic growth , demographic economics , political science , psychology , medicine , sociology , rural area , nursing , economics , demography , psychiatry , mathematical analysis , mathematics , law
Many people with intellectual disabilities rely on social care provision, though little research has looked at how access to such provision is distributed nationally. Evidence from children's services suggests that there are large discrepancies between local authorities ( LA s) in terms of the resources expended on interventions with children and families, which can be explained by variations linked to geographical location, namely the level of socioeconomic deprivation between LA s, constituting ‘child welfare inequalities’. This study explored relationships between resources allocated to community services for people with intellectual disabilities in England and geographical factors, including deprivation, rurality and political leadership in the LA s where these individuals reside. Data were sourced from publicly available reports of spending of 151 English councils with adult social services responsibilities ( CASSR s) for 2013–2014 and from CASSR index of multiple deprivation ( IMD ) scores and rurality for the same period. We found that more deprived LA s supported more people with intellectual disabilities, per 100,000 of population. We did not find effects for rurality or political party. However, it was not the case that more deprived LA s allocated more funds for expenditure on this group. These findings point to inequities in the distribution of social care resources for people with intellectual disabilities in England, as although more deprived LA s support more people with intellectual disabilities, they do not spend proportionally larger sums of money on this group. We discuss possible explanations for these findings and highlight the need for more research, particularly investigations about allocation of resources within LA s and more detailed explorations of how structural factors such as socioeconomic status of service users effects service access at the local level.