Premium
User value and usability of a web‐based mindfulness intervention for families living with mental health problems
Author(s) -
Stjernswärd Sigrid,
Hansson Lars
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
health and social care in the community
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.984
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1365-2524
pISSN - 0966-0410
DOI - 10.1111/hsc.12360
Subject(s) - usability , psychological intervention , mindfulness , mental health , psychology , applied psychology , coping (psychology) , qualitative research , intervention (counseling) , medicine , nursing , clinical psychology , psychotherapist , computer science , human–computer interaction , social science , sociology
Abstract Mental health problems affect the patients and their families, who may also need therapeutic interventions. Mindfulness interventions have shown beneficial health effects for clinical and healthy populations. A web‐based mindfulness intervention was tailored to address families’ needs of support and tested in a pilot intervention study. The aim of this study was to explore the participants’ experiences of using an 8‐week web‐based mindfulness programme in terms of user value and usability. Qualitative semi‐structured interviews were carried out over the phone (Spring 2015, Sweden) with 15 randomly selected participants after the 3‐month follow‐up as part of the pilot study. Data were also collected through usability surveys online post intervention and at the 3‐month follow‐up. Qualitative data were analysed with content analysis and quantitative data with descriptive statistics. The analysis of the interviews resulted in four categories describing the participants’ experiences of the programme's usability and value: A valuable and flexible tool that requires time and discipline , New perspective and coping strategies for an enhanced well‐being , I'm important too – my limits, my responsibility , and Taming the inner critic . The programme's usability was satisfactory and largely corroborated by the surveys. The programme was experienced as a valuable tool to cope with stress in both private and professional contexts, making it a viable option to support families living with mental health problems. Time for self‐care, a widened perspective, a less judgmental and more accepting attitude, deterring automatic reactions and setting limits helped the participants to deal with their situation and health. The programme's ease and flexibility of use were major advantages, although the training requires discipline. Motivators and barriers to use were illuminated, which should be considered in the development of further online services and study designs.