Premium
Engaging communities to improve mental health in A frican and A frican C aribbean groups: a qualitative study evaluating the role of community well‐being champions
Author(s) -
Mantovani Nadia,
Pizzolati Micol,
Gillard Steve
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
health and social care in the community
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.984
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1365-2524
pISSN - 0966-0410
DOI - 10.1111/hsc.12288
Subject(s) - mental health , outreach , general partnership , participatory action research , community engagement , public relations , political science , sociology , nursing , medicine , psychiatry , anthropology , law
Over the last decade, Britain has undergone reforms to promote engagement in local structures of governance. These reforms have encouraged the promotion of active citizenship and have been central to the government's public service modernisation agenda. This article presents the findings from a study evaluating a pilot outreach intervention which adopted a community engagement model to address the mental health needs of African and African Caribbean groups, which entailed a partnership between faith‐based organisations, local public services and community organisations to co‐produce the pilot project. Lay people were trained to raise awareness about mental health among these communities in South London. Between 2012 and 2013, a qualitative participatory approach was used to evaluate the pilot project, which enabled a researcher to take part in the engagement phase of the pilot project, and the project co‐ordinators to be involved in the research process. Semi‐structured, one‐to‐one interviews were carried out with 13 community and well‐being champions ( CWBC s) recruited from African and African Caribbean communities (seven male and six female). This study examines the impact of the relationship between the intervention and community through the participants’ engagement in the pilot outreach project and the action undertaken as champions. We found that although CWBC s used circles of influence to share ideas about mental health and well‐being and to encourage change, they encountered resistance on the part of the people they engaged with, which resulted from a lack of knowledge about mental health, taboos and ascribed stigma. We argue that CWBC s acted as healthy examples to communicate mental health knowledge to those approached, but that they needed to be equipped with bespoke communication skills to be able to talk about such sensitive issues as mental health.