Premium
Pre‐ and post‐training evaluation of dental efficacy and activation measures in carers of adults with disabilities in S outh A ustralia – a pilot study
Author(s) -
Pradhan Archana,
Keuskamp Dominic,
Brennan David
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
health and social care in the community
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.984
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1365-2524
pISSN - 0966-0410
DOI - 10.1111/hsc.12254
Subject(s) - medicine , referral , oral hygiene , oral health , family medicine , psychosocial , dental care , nursing , dentistry , psychiatry
The aim of this pilot study was to train carers to provide oral care for adults with disabilities and to evaluate the training programme. Forty‐one carers of 103 care recipients from three disability organisations in South Australia were trained in providing oral care for adults with disabilities (April 2013–April 2014). The training included an oral presentation and practical session by a special needs dentist on completing oral health assessments ( OHA ), developing oral healthcare plans, providing oral hygiene care and assessing the need for dental referral. Continued support was provided via home visits by dental hygienists for the first 2 months and a dentist visit at 3 months. At 6 months, agreement on OHA s between the dentist and trained carers was assessed. Pre‐ and post‐training questionnaires (at 6 months) collected information on dental behaviours of carers and psychosocial factors: carer activation measure‐knowledge ( CAM ‐Knowledge), carer activation measure‐skills ( CAM ‐Skills), carer activation measure‐confidence ( CAM ‐Confidence) and carer dental efficacy ( CDE ) items (carer diligence, self‐efficacy and priority). Post‐training (among 16 retained carers), there were significant increases in the mean scores of CAM ‐Knowledge and CAM ‐Confidence, but not for CAM ‐Skills (paired‐samples t ‐tests, α = 0.05). Per cent agreement of CDE items varied little between questionnaires. Carer–dentist agreement on OHA s was generally high with kappa values ranging from 0.63 for the assessment of gums to 1.0 for the assessment of tongue, roof of mouth, denture and dental pain. Further, carers were able to assess the need for referral of their care recipients’ oral health similar to the dentist. These findings suggest that with combined theoretical and practical training and continued support, non‐dental professionals like carers can improve their knowledge and confidence in providing oral care for adults with disabilities. However, the findings of this pilot study need to be confirmed by further research in a larger study.