Premium
Performance‐based contracting in home‐care work in T he N etherlands: professionalism under pressure?
Author(s) -
Oomkens Rosanne,
Hoogenboom Marcel,
Knijn Trudie
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
health and social care in the community
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.984
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1365-2524
pISSN - 0966-0410
DOI - 10.1111/hsc.12218
Subject(s) - autonomy , job satisfaction , affect (linguistics) , work (physics) , perception , job attitude , sample (material) , psychology , business , job performance , nursing , social psychology , medicine , political science , mechanical engineering , communication , neuroscience , law , engineering , chemistry , chromatography
Our aim was to improve the understanding of the relationships between performance‐based contracting, management supportiveness and professionalism in home care. Using path analysis, this article explores the relationships between home‐care workers' perceptions of management support, implementation of performance‐based contracting (i.e. use of strict time registration rules and cost‐efficiency measures) and autonomy and intrinsic job satisfaction. We hypothesised that: use of strict time registration rules and cost‐efficiency measures relates to lower levels of autonomy and intrinsic job satisfaction (H1); there is an indirect relationship between use of strict time registration rules and use of cost‐efficiency measures and intrinsic job satisfaction via autonomy (H2); higher levels of management support relate to the use of looser time registration rules and less use of cost‐efficiency measures (H3); and higher levels of management support relate to higher levels of autonomy and intrinsic job satisfaction (H4). We used data from a cross‐sectional survey conducted in 2010 of a sample of Dutch home‐care workers ( N = 156, response rate = 34%). Overall, our study suggests that the consequences of performance‐based contracting for professionalism are ambiguous. More specifically, using strict time registration rules is related to lower levels of autonomy, whereas using cost‐efficiency measures does not seem to affect autonomy (H1). Performance‐based contracting has no consequences for the level of fulfilment home‐care workers find in their job, as neither of the two contracting dimensions measured was directly or indirectly related to intrinsic job satisfaction (H1, H2). The role of managers must be taken into account when studying performance‐based contracting, because perceived higher management support is related to managers' less frequent use of both strict time registration rules and of cost‐efficiency measures (H3). The insight we gained into the importance of supportive managers for both autonomy and job satisfaction (H4) can help home‐care organisations improve the attractiveness of home‐care work.