z-logo
Premium
Health status and utilisation of the healthcare system by homeless and non‐homeless people in V ienna
Author(s) -
Wagner Julia,
Diehl Katharina,
Mutsch Livia,
Löffler Walter,
Burkert Nathalie,
Freidl Wolfgang
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
health and social care in the community
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.984
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1365-2524
pISSN - 0966-0410
DOI - 10.1111/hsc.12083
Subject(s) - health care , gerontology , medicine , nursing , psychology , psychiatry , political science , law
This case–control study describes the health situation, internal and external resources, and utilisation of healthcare facilities by a marginalised population consisting of homeless people in V ienna, A ustria, compared with a non‐homeless control population. Among the homeless group, participants lived in halfway houses (70%) or permanent housing (30%) in V ienna. Personal interviews were conducted in J uly 2010 with 66 homeless individuals, and their data were compared with data from non‐homeless subjects from the A ustrian H ealth I nterview S urvey using conditional logistic regression. Compared with the control group, homeless persons suffered more often from chronic diseases ( P  < 0.001) and rated their health considerably lower than the comparison group ( P  < 0.001). Homeless people suffered significantly more often from psychiatric disorders, respiratory diseases, hypertension ( P  < 0.001), digestive system diseases ( P  = 0.002) and heart diseases ( P  = 0.015) in comparison with the control group. Additionally, among homeless and non‐homeless individuals, the former more often consulted a general practitioner in a period of 28 days ( P  = 0.002). A significantly greater proportion of homeless people did not have any teeth ( P  = 0.024) and smoked significantly more ( P  = 0.002). The results demonstrate deficits in the areas of health, health behaviour, and individual and social resources of homeless people, even though homeless people seek medical care at a higher rate than controls. Continuing health promotion projects for this high‐risk group and the strengthening of social resources are recommended.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here