Premium
Factors that promote and hinder joint and integrated working between health and social care services: a review of research literature
Author(s) -
Cameron Ailsa,
Lart Rachel,
Bostock Lisa,
Coomber Caroline
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
health and social care in the community
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.984
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1365-2524
pISSN - 0966-0410
DOI - 10.1111/hsc.12057
Subject(s) - inclusion (mineral) , social care , health care , integrated care , joint (building) , work (physics) , public relations , set (abstract data type) , scale (ratio) , social welfare , psychology , political science , nursing , medicine , engineering , computer science , social psychology , architectural engineering , mechanical engineering , physics , quantum mechanics , law , programming language
Abstract This article reports the results of a review of the research evidence related to joint working in the field of adult health and social care services in the UK . It explores whether recent reforms to joint working have met the objectives set by policy‐makers. The review followed an established methodology: electronic databases were searched using predetermined terms, abstracts were screened against inclusion criteria, studies that met the criteria were read in full and assessed for inclusion and data were extracted systematically. The findings of the review suggest that there is some indication that recent developments, in particular the drive to greater integration of services, may have positive benefits for organisations as well as for users and carers of services. However, the evidence consistently reports a lack of understanding about the aims and objectives of integration, suggesting that more work needs to be done if the full potential of the renewed policy agenda on integration is to be realised. Additionally, while the review acknowledges that greater emphasis has been placed on evaluating the outcome of joint working, studies largely report small‐scale evaluations of local initiatives and few are comparative in design and therefore differences between ‘usual care’ and integrated care are not assessed. This makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions about the effectiveness of UK ‐based integrated health and social care services.