Premium
A randomized controlled trial of single‐class maintenance therapy with abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine after standard triple antiretroviral induction therapy: final 96‐week results from the FREE study
Author(s) -
Sprenger HG,
Langebeek N,
Mulder PGH,
Napel CHH,
Vriesendorp R,
Hoepelman AIM,
Legrand JC,
Koopmans PP,
Bravenboer B,
Kate RW,
Groeneveld PHP,
Bierman WFW,
Werf TS,
Gisolf EH,
Richter C
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
hiv medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.53
H-Index - 79
eISSN - 1468-1293
pISSN - 1464-2662
DOI - 10.1111/hiv.12186
Subject(s) - zidovudine , medicine , lamivudine , abacavir , regimen , viral load , gastroenterology , confidence interval , ritonavir , randomized controlled trial , virology , pharmacology , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , antiretroviral therapy , virus , viral disease , hepatitis b virus
Objectives The aim of the study was to test the antiviral efficacy of a triple nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor ( NRTI ) regimen, with potential beneficial metabolic effects, as maintenance therapy after induction with dual NRTIs and a boosted protease inhibitor ( PI ). Methods An open‐label, noninferiority study was carried out. Antiretroviral therapy ( ART )‐naïve patients with CD 4 count ≤ 350 cells/μL and HIV ‐1 RNA > 30 000 copies/mL ( n = 207) were treated with zidovudine/lamivudine and lopinavir/ritonavir. After achieving HIV ‐1 RNA < 50 copies/mL on two consecutive occasions between weeks 12 and 24 after baseline, 120 patients (baseline: median HIV ‐1 RNA 5.19 log 10 copies/mL; median CD 4 count 180 cells/μL) were randomized to receive abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine ( ABC /3 TC / ZDV ) ( n = 61) or to continue the PI ‐based ART ( n = 59). Results For the proportions of patients (intention‐to‐treat; missing = failure) with HIV ‐1 RNA < 400 copies/mL ( PI group, 66%; ABC /3 TC / ZDV group, 71%) and < 50 copies/mL ( PI group, 63%; ABC /3 TC / ZDV group, 62%) at 96 weeks, switching to ABC /3 TC / ZDV was noninferior compared with continuing the PI regimen; the difference in failure rate ( ABC /3 TC / ZDV minus PI ) was −4.4 percentage points [95% confidence interval ( CI ) −21.0 to +12.3 percentage points] and +0.4 percentage points (95% CI −16.9 to +17.7 percentage points), respectively. In the per protocol analysis, the difference in virological failure for HIV ‐1 RNA > 400 copies/mL (0 of 39 patients in the PI group and two of 45 patients in the NRTI group) and for HIV ‐1 RNA > 50 copies/mL (two of 39 and three of 45 patients, respectively) was +4.4 percentage points (95% CI −2.1 to +11.0 percentage points) and +1.5 percentage points (95% CI −8.6 to +11.7 percentage points), respectively, also showing noninferiority. Serum lipids significantly improved in the NRTI group, but not in the PI arm.Conclusions A single‐class NRTI regimen after successful induction with standard ART had similar antiviral efficacy compared to continuation of a PI ‐based regimen at 96 weeks after baseline, with improved serum lipids.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom