Premium
OBJECTS OF HISTORY: THE PAST MATERIALIZED 1
Author(s) -
Findlen Paula
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
history and theory
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.169
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1468-2303
pISSN - 0018-2656
DOI - 10.1111/hith.12158
Subject(s) - materialism , scholarship , environmental history , public history , material culture , history of science , deep time , object (grammar) , sociology , history of technology , history , historiography , field (mathematics) , aesthetics , epistemology , anthropology , archaeology , media studies , art , law , philosophy , mathematics , economic history , pure mathematics , paleontology , linguistics , biology , political science
What is the role of material culture in understanding the past? This review essay explores two principal approaches—the history of museums and antiquities and environmental history—to reflect on their shared investment in historical materialism. It reviews Timothy LeCain's The Matter of History and Peter Miller's History and Its Objects , discussing their perspectives on objects and the writing of history. One important part of this history concerns the relationship of academic historians to the idea of a history museum, curatorial practices, and public history. What kinds of history can we do in a museum, with things, that might not occur without the presence of objects? Why were nineteenth‐ and early twentieth‐century efforts to encourage a close relationship between historical research and the history museum largely abandoned in favor of a document‐driven approach? The second dimension of current interest in historical materialism concerns new approaches to environmental history. It draws inspiration from Deep History as well as recent work in archaeology and STS (Science and Technology Studies) to argue for a more integrated history of humans and nature that demonstrates how things have made us. The history of successive efforts to remake the environment in different parts of the world and their consequences offers crucial object lessons in how humans have responded to nature's own creativity. Both approaches to historical materialism highlight the virtues of a more interdisciplinary approach to historical scholarship, in the museum or in the field, but most important, in our own sensibilities about what it means to think historically with artifacts and to treat them as compelling evidence of a shared history of humanity and nature.