Premium
C4d detection and histological patterns in the diagnosis of antibody‐mediated rejection after lung transplantation: a single‐centre study
Author(s) -
Ngo Carine,
Danel Claire,
DuongQuy Sy,
Dauriat Gaëlle,
Castier Yves,
LortatJacob Brice,
Mal Hervé,
Brugière Olivier,
Cazes Aurélie
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
histopathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.626
H-Index - 124
eISSN - 1365-2559
pISSN - 0309-0167
DOI - 10.1111/his.13823
Subject(s) - medicine , lung transplantation , lung , transplantation , histopathology , serology , concomitant , pathology , immunohistochemistry , gastroenterology , histology , antibody , immunology
Aims Antibody‐mediated rejection ( AMR ) is an emerging and challenging issue in transplantation. Endothelial deposition of C4d and microvascular inflammation ( MI ) are reliable markers of AMR in renal and cardiac transplantation, but remain controversial in the lung. Our aim was to assess C4d immunohistochemistry and histological patterns for the diagnosis of lung AMR . Methods and results We reviewed 158 transbronchial biopsies ( TBB s) ( n = 85 clinically indicated, and n = 73 surveillance TBB s) from 48 recipients, blinded to clinical and serological data. C4d was scored as 0, 1+ (<10%), 2+ (10–50%) or 3+ (>50%). TBB s were reassessed for MI and acute lung injury ( ALI ). Donor‐specific antibodies ( DSA s), acute clinical graft dysfunction and chronic lung allograft graft dysfunction ( CLAD ) were recorded. C4d3+, C4d2+, C4d1+ and C4d0 occurred respectively in four (2.5%), six (3.8%), 28 (17.7%) and 120 (75.9%) TBB s. MI and ALI were rare but more frequent in C4d1–3+ TBB s than in the absence of C4d. C4d2+ was frequently observed with concomitant infection. Among the surveillance TBB s, only two (2.7%) showed MI . Neither ALI nor C4d3+ was diagnosed on surveillance TBB s. No significant association was found between histopathological findings and DSA s. All four patients with C4d3+ could retrospectively be diagnosed with AMR and developed CLAD . Conclusion Although rare, diffuse C4d deposition appears to be a strong indication of acute clinical AMR in lung transplant patients, whereas intermediate C4d2+ requires more investigations. In stable patients, histopathology and C4d may lack the sensitivity to diagnose subclinical AMR . This emphasises the need for a multidisciplinary evaluation of each suspected AMR case, and the need for complementary diagnostic tools.