z-logo
Premium
HER 2 assessment in locally advanced gastric cancer: comparing the results obtained with the use of two primary tumour blocks versus those obtained with the use of all primary tumour blocks
Author(s) -
Xu Chen,
Liu Yalan,
Jiang Dongxian,
Ge Xiaowen,
Zhang Ying,
Su Jieakesu,
Zeng Haiying,
Huang Jie,
Ji Yuan,
Hou Jun,
Sun Yihong,
Shen Kuntang,
Liu Tianshu,
Hou Yingyong,
Qin Jing
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
histopathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.626
H-Index - 124
eISSN - 1365-2559
pISSN - 0309-0167
DOI - 10.1111/his.13257
Subject(s) - block (permutation group theory) , medicine , immunohistochemistry , fish <actinopterygii> , biomarker , surgery , oncology , biology , mathematics , geometry , fishery , biochemistry
Aims HER 2 is currently the only biomarker used to select eligible patients with advanced gastric cancer ( GC ) for targeted therapy. The aims of this study were to verify the value of dual‐block HER 2 assessment and to explore whether increasing the block number is more beneficial by carrying out a randomized prospective cohort study in which dual‐block and all‐block HER 2 assessment were compared in resected specimens of GC . Methods and results Five hundred and forty‐nine resected GC specimens were randomly enrolled into two cohorts: a dual‐block group ( n = 274) with two primary tumour blocks tested, and an all‐block group ( n = 275) with all primary tumour blocks tested. Immunohistochemical staining of HER 2 was performed. For HER 2‐equivocal (2+) cases, fluorescence in‐situ hybridization ( FISH ) was performed. As compared with single‐block assessment, dual‐block assessment increased the HER 2 immunohistochemistry ( IHC )‐positive (3+) rate. The rate with dual‐block assessment (11.3%) was significantly higher than that with block 1 assessment (8.8%) ( P = 0.016) and block 2 assessment (9.1%) ( P = 0.031). Similarly, all‐block assessment demonstrated a higher HER 2 3+ rate (12.4%) than single‐block assessment (block 1, 6.5%; block 2, 6.2%; block 3, 7.2%; block 4, 8.7%) ( P < 0.05). HER 2 3+ rates of all‐block and dual‐block assessments showed no significant difference ( P = 0.703). After IHC and FISH results had been combined, the HER 2‐positive rate with all‐block assessment (13.5%) was slightly higher than that with dual‐block assessment (12.0%), although the difference was not statistically significant ( P = 0.62). Conclusions Dual‐block immunohistochemical assessment is an effective, practical and economic approach that is suitable for the preliminary screening of HER 2. We recommend that dual‐block HER 2 assessment be routinely performed on resected specimens of GC . All‐block assessment can be a supplement to dual‐block assessment if necessary.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom