Premium
Molecular subtyping of mammary‐like adenocarcinoma of the vulva shows molecular similarity to breast carcinomas
Author(s) -
TessierCloutier Basile,
AslehAburaya Karama,
Shah Varsha,
McCluggage W Glenn,
Tinker Anna,
Gilks C Blake
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
histopathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.626
H-Index - 124
eISSN - 1365-2559
pISSN - 0309-0167
DOI - 10.1111/his.13239
Subject(s) - cytokeratin , immunohistochemistry , vulva , pathology , adenocarcinoma , breast cancer , progesterone receptor , biology , epidermal growth factor receptor , subtyping , medicine , cancer , estrogen receptor , computer science , programming language
Aims Mammary‐like adenocarcinoma ( MLA ) of the vulva is thought to be derived from vulvar mammary‐like glands. The aim of this study was to characterize a series of MLA s by using an immunohistochemical algorithm that identifies the major molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Methods and results Seven cases of vulval MLA were stained for oestrogen receptor ( ER ), progesterone receptor ( PR ), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ( HER 2), Ki67, epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ), cytokeratin ( CK ) 5, nestin, and inositol polyphosphate‐4‐phosphatase ( INPP 4b). Seventeen cases of vulval extramammary Paget disease ( EMPD ), seven with invasion, were studied for comparison. The median age of patients with MLA was 72 years. All tumours except one were early‐stage tumours. On the basis of an immunohistochemical panel, three of seven tumours were classified as luminal B, two of seven as HER 2‐enriched, one of seven as luminal A, and one of seven as basal‐like. ER was expressed in four of seven tumours, PR in three of seven, HER 2 in three of seven, EGFR in two of seven, and CK 5 in one of seven, and the Ki67 index was >15% in six of seven cases. Nestin and INPP 4b were, respectively, negative and positive in all cases. Of the seven cases of invasive EMPD , two showed a luminal A profile, three a luminal B profile (two of three with HER 2 amplification), one a HER 2‐enriched profile, and one a basal‐like profile. Three of seven were HER 2 ‐amplified. Among the 10 cases of EMPD without invasion, seven showed a luminal A profile and three showed a luminal B profile (all HER 2 ‐amplified); no HER 2‐enriched or basal‐like subtypes were identified. Conclusions Breast cancer subtyping can be applied to vulvar MLA s. All four intrinsic molecular subtypes are seen, with frequencies similar to those in breast carcinoma. Our results support the potential use of breast cancer molecular profiling algorithms to guide treatment for these cancers.