z-logo
Premium
Prognostic significance of CD9 expression differs between tumour cells and stromal immune cells, and depends on the molecular subtype of the invasive breast carcinoma
Author(s) -
Kwon Hee Jung,
Choi Jung Eun,
Kang Su Hwan,
Son Youlim,
Bae Young Kyung
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
histopathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.626
H-Index - 124
eISSN - 1365-2559
pISSN - 0309-0167
DOI - 10.1111/his.13184
Subject(s) - stromal cell , tissue microarray , immunohistochemistry , pathology , tetraspanin , univariate analysis , lymphovascular invasion , biology , breast cancer , lymph node , cancer research , metastasis , medicine , oncology , cancer , cell , multivariate analysis , genetics
Aims CD 9, a tetraspanin transmembrane protein, modulates cell motility, migration, and proliferation. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of CD 9 expression in patients with invasive breast carcinoma ( IBC ). Methods and results CD 9 expression was evaluated in tissue microarrays of 1349 IBC samples via immunohistochemistry. CD 9 expression in tumour cells (T‐ CD 9 expression) and CD 9 expression in stromal immune cells (S‐ CD 9 expression) were analysed separately. T‐ CD 9 expression was observed in 732 (54.3%) cases, and was associated with lymph node metastasis, histological type, lymphovascular invasion, high histological grade, HER 2 positivity, a high Ki67 labelling index, and distant metastasis. S‐ CD 9 expression was observed in 833 (61.7%) cases, and was associated with large tumour size, histological type, high histological grade, negative hormone receptors, HER 2 positivity, a high Ki67 labelling index, and tumour‐infiltrating lymphocytes. Patients with T‐ CD 9 expression had shorter disease‐free survival ( DFS ) than those without T‐ CD 9 expression in the univariate and multivariate analyses. However, S‐ CD 9 expression correlated significantly with a favourable DFS in the univariate and multivariate analyses. In the subgroup analysis, T‐ CD 9 expression and S‐ CD 9 expression were independent markers for DFS in luminal A and luminal B ( HER 2‐negative) subgroups, respectively. Conclusions T‐ CD 9 expression could be a biomarker for poor prognosis in luminal A IBC , whereas S‐ CD 9 expression could be a marker of good prognosis in luminal B ( HER 2‐negative) IBC . Therefore, tumour compartment‐specific analyses considering molecular subtypes are necessary to study the prognostic significance of CD 9 expression in IBC .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom