Premium
Pre‐requisites, barriers and advantages of clinical informationist participation in grand round: a qualitative study
Author(s) -
ZareFarashbandi Elahe,
ZareFarashbandi Firoozeh,
Adibi Peyman,
Rahimi Alireza
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
health information and libraries journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.779
H-Index - 38
eISSN - 1471-1842
pISSN - 1471-1834
DOI - 10.1111/hir.12273
Subject(s) - nonprobability sampling , qualitative research , medical education , content analysis , medicine , qualitative analysis , psychology , nursing , sociology , population , social science , environmental health
Background Clinical specialists require access to the most recent and up to date professional information. However, barriers such as insufficient time and lack of necessary information retrieval skills necessitate the presence of clinical informationist ( CI ) in medical teams. Objectives This study sought to determine the pre‐requisite for CI participation in the grand round. Methods This was a qualitative study carried out using content analysis approach. Study involved all fellowship students and attending physicians in the department of gastroenterology at Al‐Zahra hospital in Isfahan (Iran), who were selected using purposive sampling. Gathered reports were analysed using qualitative content analysis and concept mapping approaches. Discussion To improve the process of CI collaboration with clinical specialists during the educational rounds, it is necessary for CI to have certain pre‐requisite skills. Conclusions By identifying the pre‐requisites for CI participation in the grand round and explaining advantages of this participation for clinical specialists, this study proposes a suitable process for implantation of CI participation in grand rounds.