Open AccessReflections from the COVID‐19 pandemic on inequalities and patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in social care, health and public health research
Author(s) -
Clark Michael,
Vliet Esther,
Collins Michelle
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
health expectations
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.314
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1369-7625
pISSN - 1369-6513
DOI - 10.1111/hex.13278
Subject(s) - pandemic , public health , public engagement , inequality , public relations , health care , face (sociological concept) , covid-19 , social inequality , sociology , political science , psychology , medicine , nursing , social science , mathematical analysis , disease , mathematics , pathology , infectious disease (medical specialty) , law
Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) has evolved to become widely established practice in social care, health and public health research in the UK. The COVID‐19 pandemic has caused rapid change in practice in PPIE, notably in moving from face‐to‐face meetings to virtual ones. This has opened a space for reflecting on established PPIE practice, but there is a risk this is conducted too narrowly, such as only weighing our preferences and the relative pros and cons with regard to in‐person versus virtual meetings. The pandemic has also demonstrated the wide inequalities in society, and hence, we argue that an inequalities lens ought to guide a deeper and wider reflection on PPIE practice. We do not seek to criticize practice pre‐ or during the pandemic, but to encourage using the inequalities lens as a means of encouraging debate and focusing energy on a more rigorous review of PPIE practice to widen involvement in social care, health and public health research.