Open AccessI am ready to see you now, Doctor! A mixed‐method study of the Let's Discuss Health website implementation in Primary Care
Author(s) -
Lussier MarieThérèse,
Richard Claude,
Binta Diallo Fatoumata,
Boivin Nathalie,
Hudon Catherine,
Boustani Élie,
Witteman Holly,
Jbilou Jalila
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
health expectations
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.314
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1369-7625
pISSN - 1369-6513
DOI - 10.1111/hex.13158
Subject(s) - general partnership , perception , intervention (counseling) , medicine , health care , nursing , primary care , quality (philosophy) , medical education , psychology , family medicine , philosophy , finance , epistemology , neuroscience , economics , economic growth
Abstract Background Let's Discuss Health (LDH) is a website that encourages patients to prepare their health‐care encounters by providing communication training, review of topics and questions that are important to them. Objective To describe LDH implementation during primary care (PC) visits for chronic illnesses. Methods Design: Descriptive mixed‐method study. Setting: 6 PC clinics. Participants: 156 patients and 51 health‐care providers (HCP). Intervention: LDH website implementation. Outcome Measures: Perceived quality and usefulness of LDH; perceived quality of HCP‐patient communication; patient activation; LDH integration in routine PC practices and barriers to its use. Results Patients reported a positive perception of the website in that it helped them to adopt an active role in the encounters; recall their visit agenda and reduce encounter‐related stress; feel more confident to ask questions, feel more motivated to prepare their future medical visits and improve their chronic illness management. However, a certain disconnect emerged between HCP and patient perceptions as to the value of LDH in promoting a sense of partnership and collaboration. The main barriers to the use of LDH are HCP lack of interest, limited access to technology, lack of time and language barriers. Conclusion Our findings indicate that it is advantageous for patients to prepare their medical encounters. However, the study needs to be replicated in other medical environments using larger and more diverse samples. Patient and Public Contribution Patient partners were involved in the conduct of this study.