Quantity over quality—Findings from a systematic review and environmental scan of patient decision aids on early abortion methods

Background The availability and effectiveness of decision aids ( DA s) on early abortion methods remain unknown, despite their potential for supporting women's decision making. Objective To describe the availability, impact and quality of DA s on surgical and medical early abortion methods for women seeking induced abortion. Search strategy For the systematic review, we searched MEDLINE , Cochrane Library, CINAHL , EMBASE and Psyc INFO . For the environmental scan, we searched Google and App Stores and consulted key informants. Inclusion criteria For the systematic review, we included studies evaluating an early abortion method DA (any format and language) vs a comparison group on women's decision making. DA s must have met the Stacey et al (2014). Cochrane review definition of DA s. For the environmental scan, we included English DA s developed for the US context. Data extraction and synthesis We extracted study and DA characteristics, assessed study quality using the Effective Practice and Organization of Care risk of bias tool and assessed DA quality using International Patient Decision Aid Standards ( IPDAS ). Results The systematic review identified one study, which found that the DA group had higher knowledge and felt more informed. The evaluated DA met few IPDAS criteria. In contrast, the environmental scan identified 49 DA s created by non‐specialists. On average, these met 28% of IPDAS criteria for Content, 22% for Development and 0% for Effectiveness. Conclusions Research evaluating DA s on early abortion methods is lacking, and although many tools are accessible, they demonstrate suboptimal quality. Efforts to revise existing or develop new DA s, support patients to identify high‐quality DA s and facilitate non‐specialist developers' adoption of best practices for DA development are needed.