Open AccessFactors associated with shared decision making among primary care physicians: Findings from a multicentre cross‐sectional study
Author(s) -
Menear Matthew,
Garvelink Mirjam Marjolein,
Adekpedjou Rhéda,
Perez Maria Margarita Becerra,
Robitaille Hubert,
Turcotte Stéphane,
Légaré France
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
health expectations
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.314
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1369-7625
pISSN - 1369-6513
DOI - 10.1111/hex.12603
Subject(s) - cross sectional study , primary care , medicine , family medicine , multivariate analysis , bayesian multivariate linear regression , scale (ratio) , medline , regression analysis , physics , pathology , quantum mechanics , machine learning , computer science , political science , law
Background Despite growing recognition that shared decision making ( SDM ) is central for patient‐centred primary care, adoption by physicians remains limited in routine practice. Objective To examine the characteristics of physicians, patients and consultations associated with primary care physicians’ SDM behaviours during routine care. Methods A multicentre cross‐sectional survey study was conducted with 114 unique patient‐physician dyads recruited from 17 primary care clinics in Quebec and Ontario, Canada. Physicians’ SDM behaviours were assessed with the 12‐item OPTION scale scored by third observers using audio‐recordings of consultations. Independent variables included 21 physician, patient and consultation characteristics. We assessed factors associated with OPTION scores using multivariate linear regression models. Results On the OPTION scale, where higher scores indicated greater SDM behaviours, physicians earned an overall mean score of 25.7±9.8 of 100. In the final adjusted regression model, higher OPTION scores were associated with physicians’ social participation (involvement in one committee β=5.75, P =.04; involvement in two or more committees β=7.74, P =.01), patients’ status as employed (β=6.48, P =.02), clinically significant decisional conflict in patients (β=7.15, P =.002) and a longer duration of consultations (β=0.23, P =.002). Conclusion Physicians’ social participation, patients’ employment status and decisional conflict and the duration of consultations were associated with primary care physicians’ SDM behaviours in routine care. These factors should be considered when designing strategies to implement SDM and promote more patient‐centred care in primary care.