
An analysis of the R esearch T eam– S ervice U ser relationship from the S ervice U ser perspective: a consideration of ‘ T he T hree R s’ (Roles, Relations, and Responsibilities) for healthcare research organisations
Author(s) -
Jordan Melanie,
Rowley Emma,
Morriss Richard,
Manning Nick
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
health expectations
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.314
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1369-7625
pISSN - 1369-6513
DOI - 10.1111/hex.12243
Subject(s) - altruism (biology) , service (business) , perspective (graphical) , qualitative research , scope (computer science) , transparency (behavior) , inclusion (mineral) , psychology , sociology , public relations , knowledge management , social psychology , marketing , computer science , business , political science , programming language , computer security , social science , artificial intelligence
Background This article debates interview data from service users who engaged with the work of a Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care ( CLAHRC ). The evidence base, to date, concerning the nature of CLAHRC work at the frontline (i.e. What is it actually like to do CLAHRC work?) is meagre; thus, this article represents an original contribution to that literature. Further, this article analyses service users' participation in research – as members of the research team – and so contributes to the body of developing literature regarding involvement too. Objective This article explores the nature of the Research Team–Service User relationship, plus associated roles, relations and responsibilities of collaborative health research. Design Qualitative social science research was undertaken in a health‐care research organization utilizing interview method and a medical sociology and organizational sociology theoretical framework for analysis. Data utilized originate from a larger evaluation study that focuses on the CLAHRC as an iterative organization and explores members' experiences. Results There can be a disparity between initial expectations and actual experiences of involvement for service users. Therefore, as structured via ‘The Three Rs’ (Roles, Relations and Responsibilities), aspects of the relationship are evaluated (e.g. motivation, altruism, satisfaction, transparency, scope, feedback, communication, time). Regarding the inclusion of service users in health research teams, a careful consideration of ‘The Three Rs’ is required to ensure expectations match experiences .