Open AccessSupporting public involvement in research design and grant development: a case study of a public involvement award scheme managed by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Research Design Service (RDS)
Author(s) -
Boote Jonathan D.,
Twiddy Maureen,
Baird Wendy,
Birks Yvonne,
Clarke Clare,
Beever Daniel
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
health expectations
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.314
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1369-7625
pISSN - 1369-6513
DOI - 10.1111/hex.12130
Subject(s) - public involvement , public health , public relations , scheme (mathematics) , public funding , resource (disambiguation) , medicine , political science , medical education , business , public administration , nursing , computer science , mathematical analysis , computer network , mathematics
Background It is good practice for the public to be involved in developing health research. Resources should be available for researchers to fund the involvement of the public in the development of their grants. Objective To describe a funding award scheme to support public involvement in grant development, managed by an NIHR Research Design Service ( RDS ). Case examples of how the award contributed to successful grant applications and findings from a recent evaluation of the scheme are presented. Design A case study of resource provision to support public involvement activities in one region of England. Participants University and NHS ‐based researchers, and members of the public. Findings Between 2009 and 2012, the RDS approved 45 public involvement funding awards (totalling nearly £19 000). These awards contributed to 27 submitted applications at the time of writing, of which 11 were successful (totalling over £7.5 million). The evaluation revealed difficulties encountered by some researchers when involving the public in grant development, which led to suggestions about how the scheme could be improved. Conclusion This award scheme represents an efficient method of providing researchers with resources to involve the public in grant development and would appear to represent good value for money.