Premium
Improved visualization of a fine intrahepatic biliary duct on drip infusion cholangiography‐computed tomography: Impact of knowledge‐based iterative model reconstruction
Author(s) -
Takao Seiichiro,
Nishie Akihiro,
Asayama Yoshiki,
Ishigami Kousei,
Ushijima Yasuhiro,
Kakihara Daisuke,
Nakayama Tomohiro,
Fujita Nobuhiro,
Morita Koichiro,
Ishimatsu Keisuke,
Yoshizumi Tomoharu,
Ikegami Toru,
Kondo Masatoshi,
Honda Hiroshi
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
hepatology research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.123
H-Index - 75
eISSN - 1872-034X
pISSN - 1386-6346
DOI - 10.1111/hepr.13477
Subject(s) - medicine , nuclear medicine , visualization , cholangiography , radiology , liver transplantation , iterative reconstruction , tomography , diatrizoate meglumine , transplantation , artificial intelligence , computer science , surgery
Aim The purpose of this study was to investigate the visualization of fine biliary ducts with knowledge‐based iterative model reconstruction (IMR) in low‐dose drip infusion computed tomography (CT) cholangiography (DIC‐CT) as compared with filtered back projection (FBP) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose 4 ). Methods A total of 38 patients underwent DIC‐CT for living donor liver transplantation. CT was performed approximately 20 min after the end of the infusion of meglumine iotroxate (100 mL). Images were reconstructed using FBP, iDose 4 , and IMR, and 1‐mm slice images at fixed window level and width were prepared for assessment. Two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of visualization of the fine biliary ducts of the caudate lobe (B1) using a 5‐point scale. The visualization scores of three reconstructed images were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney U ‐test. Results For reviewer 1, the visualization score of IMR was significantly higher than that of FBP ( P = 0.012), and tended to be higher than that of iDose 4 ( P = 0.078). For reviewer 2, the visualization score of IMR was significantly higher than those of both FBP and iDose 4 ( P < 0.01). Conclusions IMR showed better visualization of B1 on DIC‐CT than FBP or iDose 4 . DIC‐CT reconstructed with IMR may be useful to the anatomical grasp of biliary tracts in cases of hepatectomy.