Premium
Development and Internal Validation of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Episodic Migraine Attacks Based on Daily Trigger Exposures
Author(s) -
Holsteen Katherine K.,
Hittle Michael,
Barad Meredith,
Nelson Lorene M.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
headache: the journal of head and face pain
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.14
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1526-4610
pISSN - 0017-8748
DOI - 10.1111/head.13960
Subject(s) - migraine , medicine , logistic regression , headaches , confounding , framingham risk score , evening , physical therapy , disease , psychiatry , physics , astronomy
Objective To develop and internally validate a multivariable predictive model for days with new‐onset migraine headaches based on patient self‐prediction and exposure to common trigger factors. Background Accurate real‐time forecasting of one’s daily risk of migraine attack could help episodic migraine patients to target preventive medications for susceptible time periods and help decrease the burden of disease. Little is known about the predictive utility of common migraine trigger factors. Methods We recruited adults with episodic migraine through online forums to participate in a 90‐day prospective daily‐diary cohort study conducted through a custom research application for iPhone. Every evening, participants answered questions about migraine occurrence and potential predictors including stress, sleep, caffeine and alcohol consumption, menstruation, and self‐prediction. We developed and estimated multivariable multilevel logistic regression models for the risk of a new‐onset migraine day vs a healthy day and internally validated the models using repeated cross‐validation. Results We had 178 participants complete the study and qualify for the primary analysis which included 1870 migraine events. We found that a decrease in caffeine consumption, higher self‐predicted probability of headache, a higher level of stress, and times within 2 days of the onset of menstruation were positively associated with next‐day migraine risk. The multivariable model predicted migraine risk only slightly better than chance (within‐person C‐statistic: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.54, 0.58). Conclusions In this study, episodic migraine attacks were not predictable based on self‐prediction or on self‐reported exposure to common trigger factors. Improvements in accuracy and breadth of data collection are needed to build clinically useful migraine prediction models.