Premium
Successful Long‐Term Central Venous Access
Author(s) -
Tesio Franco,
Baz Hamurabi De,
Panarello Giacomo
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
home hemodialysis international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1542-4758
pISSN - 1480-0225
DOI - 10.1111/hdi.1998.2.1.38
Subject(s) - medicine , catheter , surgery , hemodialysis , arteriovenous fistula , internal jugular vein , sepsis , fistula , central venous pressure , vascular access , dialysis , jugular vein , vein , hemodialysis catheter , anesthesia , blood pressure , heart rate
Daily home hemodialysis (DHHD) requires simple, vascular access to minimize patients' discomfort but also to guarantee tolerance and long‐term efficiency. The arteriovenous fistula is not ideal for DHHD because of the double puncture required every day; in addition, the rate of dysfunction is probably greater because of the more frequent use. Central venous catheters may be a good alternative to the arteriovenous fistula as long‐term vascular access for DHHD. In this study we report our experience with the internal jugular vein two‐catheter access for long‐term dialysis and evaluate its possible use for DHHD. Since 1988, Tesio's twin catheters have been positioned in 908 patients with exhausted peripheral vascular bed. In all patients hemodialysis could be performed a few minutes after the surgical procedure. The survival rate of catheters, in a selected group of 46 patients, at 1, 2, and 5 years was, respectively, 92%, 87%, and 82%. The mean blood flow was 282±29 mL/min at 1 month, 286±36 mL/min at 1 year, and 274±37 mL/min at 5 years. Venous pressure in the inlet side was 102±31 mm Hg at 1 month, 126±36 mm Hg at 1 year, and 132±58 mm Hg at 5 years. Catheter clotting was treated either with thrombolytic agents or with catheter (one or both) replacement. Sepsis was treated with systemic antibiotic therapy or catheter removal. Data support the potential role of the internal jugular vein two‐catheter system for DHHD.