z-logo
Premium
Restroom restrictions: How race and sexuality have affected bathroom legislation
Author(s) -
SpenceMitchell Tynslei
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
gender, work and organization
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.159
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1468-0432
pISSN - 0968-6673
DOI - 10.1111/gwao.12545
Subject(s) - legislation , human sexuality , race (biology) , white (mutation) , gender studies , sociology , black women , political science , psychology , social psychology , law , biochemistry , chemistry , gene
This research details how current bathroom legislation that discriminates against trans individuals is rooted in the same discriminatory practices that permitted Jim Crow bathroom policies to exist. Sexualities that are considered nonwhite, non‐heterosexual, or non‐cisgendered are considered “othered,” as they are perceived to be a threat to the fertility of cis white women. This study details how sexuality stereotypes have been defined between white and black men and women, homosexual people, and trans‐people (with an emphasis on trans women).

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here