Premium
Battles through and about statistics in French pay equity bargaining: The politics of quantification at workplace level
Author(s) -
Pochic Sophie,
Chappe VincentArnaud
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
gender, work and organization
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.159
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1468-0432
pISSN - 0968-6673
DOI - 10.1111/gwao.12298
Subject(s) - equity (law) , context (archaeology) , bargaining power , politics , collective bargaining , perspective (graphical) , public relations , industrial relations , economics , public economics , business , political science , labour economics , management , microeconomics , law , computer science , paleontology , artificial intelligence , biology
This article proposes to study the discreet ‘battles of numbers’ at workplace level, particularly exacerbated on pay equity, in relation to its potential additional costs for employers. Figures are at once a framework, an object and a resource for power struggles between social partners. This approach is inspired by ‘statactivism’, a research perspective that studies the ways and contexts in which statistics can become tools for social mobilization. In a European context where bargaining is increasingly decentralized to company level, we argue that researchers should pay attention to statistical resources and quantification skills of negotiators, both on the management and unions side. They should also include in their analytical framework the influence of experts and specialists who advise social partners on how to strategically produce and use gender‐sensitive statistics. In this article, two case studies allow us to open the ‘black box’ of equality bargaining, revealing challenges and controversies of gender pay reporting.