Premium
Understanding evolving public motivational practices: An institutional analysis
Author(s) -
Boruvka Elise,
Perry James L.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
governance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.46
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1468-0491
pISSN - 0952-1895
DOI - 10.1111/gove.12460
Subject(s) - bureaucracy , new public management , realpolitik , perspective (graphical) , public sector , public service , public management , political science , public administration , adaptation (eye) , positive economics , sociology , economics , psychology , artificial intelligence , politics , computer science , law , neuroscience
Abstract New public management (NPM) has been the focus of research and reform practices in countries globally since the late 1970s. This article looks at NPM in historical perspective with particular attention to understanding the evolution of public motivational practices. Three different eras and motivational models common in OECD countries are discussed—the bureaucratic model, the NPM model, and the new public service model. This long‐linked historical perspective highlights the interplay between administrative theory and realpolitik. It is possible to see how certain priorities have been a result of or led to the preservation, the adaptation, or the discontinuation of practices in alignment with the values and behaviors of the successive reform eras. Additional research into the dynamics of change in the public sector is suggested.