Premium
Pathways to Institutional Legitimacy in Postconflict Societies: Perceptions of Process and Performance in Nepal
Author(s) -
Fisk Kylie,
Cherney Adrian
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
governance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.46
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1468-0491
pISSN - 0952-1895
DOI - 10.1111/gove.12208
Subject(s) - legitimacy , procedural justice , context (archaeology) , government (linguistics) , corporate governance , perception , economic justice , service delivery framework , distributive justice , political science , public relations , public administration , service (business) , business , psychology , politics , law , paleontology , linguistics , philosophy , finance , marketing , neuroscience , biology
Rebuilding institutional legitimacy is considered essential for stability in postconflict societies, yet the factors that influence citizen perceptions of legitimacy in this context remain underresearched. In this article, we examine citizen evaluations of government legitimacy in terms of instrumental antecedents (service delivery, distributive justice) and procedural antecedents (procedural justice, voice), using data collected in the context of a nationwide study of postconflict governance in Nepal. We find that procedural justice is more strongly associated with citizen perceptions of institutional legitimacy than instrumental outcomes such as service delivery, distributive justice, and outcome favorability. Results indicate that the relationship between service delivery and legitimacy is not as simple as previously assumed. We conclude that procedural justice is crucial for building perceptions of government legitimacy in postconflict societies and discuss implications for policy and practice relating to postconflict governance and institutional trust building.