Premium
Forage yield and chemical composition of canola ( Brassica napus L.) as affected by sowing methods
Author(s) -
RetaSánchez D. G.,
SerratoCorona J. S.,
QuirogaGarza H. M.,
GaytánMascorro A.,
FigueroaViramontes U.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
grass and forage science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.716
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1365-2494
pISSN - 0142-5242
DOI - 10.1111/gfs.12174
Subject(s) - sowing , canola , forage , brassica , agronomy , dry matter , growing season , yield (engineering) , chemical composition , composition (language) , mathematics , biology , chemistry , physics , linguistics , philosophy , thermodynamics , organic chemistry
The sowing method of spring‐type canola ( Brassica napus L. var. oleifera) for forage has a major influence on its productivity and agronomic management. A field experiment was conducted in Matamoros, Coahuila, Mexico, during two growing seasons (2008–2009 and 2009–2010) to determine dry matter ( DM ), crude protein ( CP ) and net energy for lactation ( NE L ) yields, as well as canola forage chemical composition as a function of six sowing methods. The treatments assessed were broadcast sowing and five different row spacings: 0·19, 0·38, 0·57, 0·76 and 0·95 m (double row, 0·20 m apart). In the first year, with a mean growing season temperature of 17·2°C, sowing methods did not affect DM yield, but CP and NE L content and yield were higher in 0·19‐m row spacing. The mean temperature in the second year (13·5°C) was slightly lower than the long‐term mean (14·8°C) in the region, resulting in the highest DM (8840 kg ha −1 ), CP (2486 kg ha −1 ) and NE L yields (51 103 MJ ha −1 ) with 0·19‐m row spacing. In row‐sowing methods with over 0·19‐m row spacing, DM , CP and NE L yields decreased by 19·3–39·7, 20·4–42·1 and 21·2–42·7% respectively. Results indicate that sowing methods significantly affected canola forage productivity.