Premium
Bahiagrass response and N loss from selected N fertilizer sources
Author(s) -
Silveira M. L.,
Vendramini J. M. B.,
Sellers B.,
Monteiro F. A.,
Artur A. G.,
Dupas E.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
grass and forage science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.716
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1365-2494
pISSN - 0142-5242
DOI - 10.1111/gfs.12078
Subject(s) - paspalum notatum , urea , fertilizer , human fertilization , ammonium nitrate , chemistry , ammonium , dry matter , zoology , nitrogen , agronomy , ammonium sulfate , nitrate , factorial experiment , biology , mathematics , biochemistry , statistics , organic chemistry , chromatography
The increasing cost of commercial fertilizers and environmental problems associated with improper fertilization management have prompted the need to re‐examine commercial N sources that can effectively supply N to pastures while minimizing N losses. This 3‐year study evaluated the effects of selected N sources on bahiagrass ( P aspalum notatum F lügge) responses, soil properties and N losses. Treatments consisted of a factorial combination of 6 N sources [(i) ammonium nitrate (AN), (ii) ammonium sulphate (AS), (iii) urea (U), (iv) urea treated with A grotain (U + Agrotain), (v) SuperU and (vi) ammonium sulphate nitrate] and 3 N levels (0, 60 or 120 kg ha −1 year −1 ), replicated three times. Bahiagrass dry‐matter yield ( DMY ), crude protein ( CP ) concentration, N uptake and recovery were not affected by N source, with the exception of AN that resulted in reduced DMY in 2010 compared with the other sources. Bahiagrass DMY , CP concentration, N uptake and recovery increased linearly as N levels increased. Nitrogen fertilization showed no effect on soil pH or soil N accumulation. Soil pore‐water N concentrations from treatments fertilized with N were similar to the control plots indicating no threat to the environment. At the N levels evaluated in this study, selection of N source should be based on the fertilizer cost.