z-logo
Premium
Surface treatment with methyl formate–methyl acetate increased the shear bond strength between reline resins and denture base resin
Author(s) -
Osathananda Rachanee,
Wiwatwarrapan Chairat
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
gerodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 54
eISSN - 1741-2358
pISSN - 0734-0664
DOI - 10.1111/ger.12120
Subject(s) - acrylic resin , medicine , universal testing machine , nuclear chemistry , base (topology) , bond strength , dentistry , significant difference , composite material , materials science , adhesive , ultimate tensile strength , chemistry , mathematical analysis , mathematics , layer (electronics) , coating
Background Chemical surface treatment increases the shear bond strength ( SBS ) between hard reline resins ( HRR s) and denture base resin. Objective To evaluate the effect of methyl formate–methyl acetate ( MF ‐ MA ), when used as a surface treatment agent, on the SBS between denture base resin and different HRR s. Materials and Methods One hundred and twenty specimens of heat‐polymerised acrylic resin denture base ( M eliodent ® ) were divided into 12 groups. These groups comprised denture base relined with three self‐polymerised HRR s [ U nifast trad ® ( UT ), T okuyama ® R ebase II F ast ( TR ), U fi gel hard ® ( UG )], and treated with their respective B onding A gent ( BA ) or by MF : MA solutions at ratios of 35:65, 25:75, and 15:85 for 15 s. The SBS was measured using a U niversal T esting M achine. The data were analysed using two‐way anova and post hoc T ukey's analysis at p  <   0.05. Results The highest SBS was in the UT treated with MF : MA at a ratio of 25:75 group, followed by UT treated with MF : MA at ratios of 15:85, 35:65, UT treated with BA , and all UG treated with MF : MA groups. The SBS of the UT treated with MF : MA at a ratio of 25:75 group was significantly higher than those of the groups treated with BA . The SBS of the UG treated with MF : MA groups was significantly higher than control. The TR groups treated with BA or MF : MA groups showed no significant difference in SBS . Conclusion Surface treatment with MF ‐ MA significantly enhanced the SBS of denture base resin and UT and UG compared to that of the groups treated with BA .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom