Premium
Local and regional drivers of taxonomic homogenization in stream communities along a land use gradient
Author(s) -
Budnick William R.,
Leboucher Thibault,
Belliard Jérôme,
Soininen Janne,
Lavoie Isabelle,
Pound Katrina,
Jamoneau Aurélien,
TisonRosebery Juliette,
Tales Evelyne,
Pajunen Virpi,
Campeau Stéphane,
Passy Sophia I.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
global ecology and biogeography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.164
H-Index - 152
eISSN - 1466-8238
pISSN - 1466-822X
DOI - 10.1111/geb.12976
Subject(s) - eutrophication , ecology , biodiversity , biological dispersal , trophic level , beta diversity , agricultural land , intraspecific competition , land use , dominance (genetics) , species richness , land cover , environmental science , geography , biology , population , nutrient , biochemistry , demography , sociology , gene
Aim The interaction of land use with local versus regional processes driving biological homogenization (β‐diversity loss) is poorly understood. We explored: (a) stream β‐diversity responses to land cover (forest versus agriculture) in terms of physicochemistry and physicochemical heterogeneity; (b) whether these responses were constrained by the regional species pool, i.e. γ‐diversity, or local assembly processes through local (α) diversity; (c) whether local assembly operated through the regional species abundance distribution (SAD) or intraspecific spatial aggregation; and (d) the dependence on body size, dispersal capacity and trophic level (producer versus consumer). Location USA, Canada and France. Time period 1993–2012. Major taxa studied Stream diatoms, insects and fish. Methods We analysed six datasets totalling 1,225 stream samples. We compared diversity responses to eutrophication and physicochemical heterogeneity in forested versus agricultural streams with regression methods. Null models quantified the contribution of local assembly to β‐diversity (β‐deviance, β DEV ) for both types of land covers and partitioned it into fractions explained by the regional SAD (β SAD ) versus aggregation (β AGG ). Results Eutrophication explained homogenization and more uneven regional SADs across groups, but local and regional biodiversity responses differed across taxa. The β DEV was insensitive to land use. The β SAD largely exceeded β AGG and was higher in agriculture. Main conclusions Eutrophication but not physicochemical heterogeneity of agricultural streams underlay β‐diversity loss in diatoms, insects and fish. Agriculture did not constrain the magnitude of local versus regional effects on β‐diversity but controlled the local assembly mechanisms. Although the SAD fraction dominated in both land covers, it increased further in agriculture at the expense of aggregation. Notably, the regional SADs were more uneven in agriculture, exhibiting excess common species or stronger dominance. Diatoms and insects diverged from fish in terms of biodiversity, SAD shape and β DEV patterns, suggesting an overriding role of body size and/or dispersal capacity compared with trophic position.