Premium
Variability in mangrove change estimates and implications for the assessment of ecosystem service provision
Author(s) -
Friess Daniel A.,
Webb Edward L.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
global ecology and biogeography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.164
H-Index - 152
eISSN - 1466-8238
pISSN - 1466-822X
DOI - 10.1111/geb.12140
Subject(s) - mangrove , geography , biodiversity , ecosystem services , tropics , deforestation (computer science) , ecosystem , ecology , environmental science , global change , climate change , environmental resource management , physical geography , biology , computer science , programming language
Aim To quantify the variability in estimates of change in mangrove area for key countries throughout the tropics, and to highlight potential implications for the assessment of global mangrove ecology, function and conservation. Location Pan‐tropical, covering 15 countries, and accounting for c. 67% of global mangrove area. Methods We review 314 national mangrove area estimates (authoritative statements with defined time periods) from various sources. Linear regression models of mangrove area over time were applied to various data point combinations, defined by data source. These included various FAO resources, as well as academic and government statistics and remote sensing studies. Results National trends of change in mangrove area exhibited high variability depending on which data points were modelled. Many countries showed high variability in deforestation rate when the results of all models were combined, e.g. I ndonesia had an average deforestation rate of 331.65 (± 222.26) km 2 yr −1 , N igeria lost 92.09 (± 188.95) km 2 yr −1 and C uba lost 34.82 (± 142.17) km 2 yr −1 . The standard deviations were large due to high variability in national estimates, and hence the number of contradictory trends that could be extracted. Conflicting trends of long‐term mangrove loss and gain could be derived for eight of the 15 countries analysed, including I ndonesia, B razil and the P hilippines. Main conclusions The great variability in trends of mangrove extent suggests that estimates of ecosystem functional loss, biodiversity threat assessments and science‐based conservation policies will be hampered by low confidence in mangrove area dynamics. Variable and inaccurate baseline data feed into various estimates of biodiversity and ecosystem functional loss, such as IUCN Red List assessments and estimates of global carbon emissions from mangrove deforestation. We also require robust information to inform conservation actions and policies hoping to reduce functional loss. Variability has important implications for all ecosystems where statistics are required over large scales.