Premium
Simulating long‐distance seed dispersal in a dynamic vegetation model
Author(s) -
Snell Rebecca S.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
global ecology and biogeography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.164
H-Index - 152
eISSN - 1466-8238
pISSN - 1466-822X
DOI - 10.1111/geb.12106
Subject(s) - biological dispersal , seed dispersal , vegetation (pathology) , ecology , temperate climate , climate change , environmental science , geography , biology , medicine , population , demography , pathology , sociology
Aim Predicting the migration of vegetation in response to climate change is often done using a climate‐driven vegetation model; however, the assumption of full migration (where seeds are not limited by distance or barriers) is a common criticism. Previous efforts to incorporate limitations on seed dispersal have occurred exclusively in bioclimatic envelope models. This paper describes how limitations on seed dispersal were integrated into a physiologically based dynamic vegetation model, LPJ‐GUESS . Location An idealized landscape, representative of temperate and boreal forests in N orth A merica. Methods LPJ‐GUESS already simulates establishment, growth, reproduction and competition. I used a generic seed dispersal kernel to determine the probability of dispersal between grid cells, and a logistic function to determine the spread between patches within a grid cell. Plant functional types were parameterized to represent three temperate tree species, A cer , P inus and T suga , by using published dispersal kernels and life‐history measurements. Simulations were run with full and limited migration, and compared with past vegetation migration rates. Results Using the old assumption of full migration, the entire landscape was colonized at the same time (migration rates of 270–380 m year −1 ). With the new limited dispersal, species colonized the landscape one row at a time, at rates which corresponded well with independent migration estimates based on genetic or pollen reconstructions ( A cer , 141 m year −1 ; P inus , 76 m year −1 ). T suga was the only species where simulated migration rates (85 m year −1 ) were quite a bit slower than historical migration estimates. Main conclusions The new model was able to simulate reasonable migration rates, which is a substantial improvement over previous assumptions of full migration. Migration estimates which include the effects of limitations on dispersal, demography, competition and plant physiology will also improve our understanding of how climate change and various other processes can influence plant range shifts.