Premium
Climate or migration: what limited E uropean beech post‐glacial colonization?
Author(s) -
Saltré Frédérik,
SaintAmant Rémi,
Gritti Emmanuel S.,
Brewer Simon,
Gaucherel Cédric,
Davis Basil A. S.,
Chuine Isabelle
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
global ecology and biogeography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.164
H-Index - 152
eISSN - 1466-8238
pISSN - 1466-822X
DOI - 10.1111/geb.12085
Subject(s) - beech , glacial period , climate change , physical geography , colonization , phylogeography , last glacial maximum , ecology , environmental science , geology , biology , geography , paleontology , biochemistry , gene , phylogenetic tree
Aim Despite the recent improvements made in species distribution models ( SDMs ), assessing species' ability to migrate fast enough to track their climate optimum remains a challenge. This study achieves this goal and demonstrates the reliability of a process‐based SDM to provide accurate projections by simulating the post‐glacial colonization of E uropean beech. Location E urope. Methods We simulated the post‐glacial colonization of European beech over the last 12,000 years by coupling a process‐based SDM ( PHENOFIT ) and a new migration model based on G ibbs point processes, both parameterized with modern ecological data. Simulations were compared with palaeoarchives and phylogeographic data on E uropean beech. Results Model predictions are consistent with palaeoarchives and phylogeographic data over the Holocene. The results suggest that post‐glacial expansion of E uropean beech was limited by climate on its north‐eastern leading edge, while limited by its migration abilities on its north‐western leading edge. The results show a mean migration rate of beech varying from 270 m yr −1 to 280 m yr −1 and a maximum migration rate varying from 560 m yr −1 to 630 m yr −1 , when limited and not limited by climate, respectively. They also highlight the relative contribution of known and suspected glacial refugia in present beech distribution and confirm the results of phylogeographic studies. Main conclusions For the first time, we were able to reproduce accurately the colonization dynamics of E uropean beech during the last 12 kyr using a process‐based SDM and a migration model, both parameterized with modern ecological data. Our methodology has allowed us to identify the different factors that affected European beech migration during its post‐glaciation expansion in different parts of its range. This method shows great potential to help palaeobotanists and phylogeographers locate putative glacial refugia, and to provide accurate projections of beech distribution change in the future.