Open AccessA Miscanthus plantation can be carbon neutral without increasing soil carbon stocks
Author(s) -
Robertson Andy D.,
Whitaker Jeanette,
Morrison Ross,
Davies Christian A.,
Smith Pete,
McNamara Niall P.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
gcb bioenergy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.378
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1757-1707
pISSN - 1757-1693
DOI - 10.1111/gcbb.12397
Subject(s) - miscanthus , environmental science , greenhouse gas , topsoil , agronomy , carbon sequestration , biomass (ecology) , soil carbon , soil respiration , bioenergy , agroforestry , soil water , carbon dioxide , renewable energy , soil science , ecology , biology
National governments and international organizations perceive bioenergy, from crops such as Miscanthus , to have an important role in mitigating greenhouse gas ( GHG ) emissions and combating climate change. In this research, we address three objectives aimed at reducing uncertainty regarding the climate change mitigation potential of commercial Miscanthus plantations in the United Kingdom: (i) to examine soil temperature and moisture as potential drivers of soil GHG emissions through four years of parallel measurements, (ii) to quantify carbon (C) dynamics associated with soil sequestration using regular measurements of topsoil (0–30 cm) C and the surface litter layer and (iii) to calculate a life cycle GHG budget using site‐specific measurements, enabling the GHG intensity of Miscanthus used for electricity generation to be compared against coal and natural gas. Our results show that methane ( CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions contributed little to the overall GHG budget of Miscanthus , while soil respiration offset 30% of the crop's net aboveground C uptake. Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration was highest during crop growth and lowest during winter months. We observed no significant change in topsoil C or nitrogen stocks following 7 years of Miscanthus cultivation. The depth of litter did, however, increase significantly, stabilizing at approximately 7 tonnes dry biomass per hectare after 6 years. The cradle‐to‐farm gate GHG budget of this crop indicated a net removal of 24.5 t CO 2 ‐eq ha −1 yr −1 from the atmosphere despite no detectable C sequestration in soils. When scaled up to consider the full life cycle, Miscanthus fared very well in comparison with coal and natural gas, suggesting considerable CO 2 offsetting per kW h generated. Although the comparison does not account for the land area requirements of the energy generated, Miscanthus used for electricity generation can make a significant contribution to climate change mitigation even when combusted in conventional steam turbine power plants.