z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Response of soil carbon dioxide fluxes, soil organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon to biochar amendment: a meta‐analysis
Author(s) -
Liu Shuwei,
Zhang Yaojun,
Zong Yajie,
Hu Zhiqiang,
Wu Shuang,
Zhou Jie,
Jin Yaguo,
Zou Jianwen
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
gcb bioenergy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.378
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1757-1707
pISSN - 1757-1693
DOI - 10.1111/gcbb.12265
Subject(s) - biochar , amendment , slash and char , soil carbon , soil water , fertilizer , carbon sequestration , agronomy , environmental science , manure , soil conditioner , chicken manure , biomass (ecology) , compost , chemistry , soil organic matter , environmental chemistry , pyrolysis , soil science , carbon dioxide , organic chemistry , biology , political science , law
Biochar as a carbon‐rich coproduct of pyrolyzing biomass, its amendment has been advocated as a potential strategy to soil carbon (C) sequestration. Updated data derived from 50 papers with 395 paired observations were reviewed using meta‐analysis procedures to examine responses of soil carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) fluxes, soil organic C (SOC), and soil microbial biomass C (MBC) contents to biochar amendment. When averaged across all studies, biochar amendment had no significant effect on soil CO 2 fluxes, but it significantly enhanced SOC content by 40% and MBC content by 18%. A positive response of soil CO 2 fluxes to biochar amendment was found in rice paddies, laboratory incubation studies, soils without vegetation, and unfertilized soils. Biochar amendment significantly increased soil MBC content in field studies, N‐fertilized soils, and soils with vegetation. Enhancement of SOC content following biochar amendment was the greatest in rice paddies among different land‐use types. Responses of soil CO 2 fluxes and MBC to biochar amendment varied with soil texture and pH. The use of biochar in combination with synthetic N fertilizer and waste compost fertilizer led to the greatest increases in soil CO 2 fluxes and MBC content, respectively. Both soil CO 2 fluxes and MBC responses to biochar amendment decreased with biochar application rate, pyrolysis temperature, or C/N ratio of biochar, while each increased SOC content enhancement. Among different biochar feedstock sources, positive responses of soil CO 2 fluxes and MBC were the highest for manure and crop residue feedstock sources, respectively. Soil CO 2 flux responses to biochar amendment decreased with pH of biochar, while biochars with pH of 8.1–9.0 had the greatest enhancement of SOC and MBC contents. Therefore, soil properties, land‐use type, agricultural practice, and biochar characteristics should be taken into account to assess the practical potential of biochar for mitigating climate change.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here