Premium
Response of the peatland carbon dioxide sink function to future climate change scenarios and water level management
Author(s) -
Salimi Shokoufeh,
Berggren Martin,
Scholz Miklas
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
global change biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.146
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1365-2486
pISSN - 1354-1013
DOI - 10.1111/gcb.15753
Subject(s) - environmental science , sink (geography) , climate change , carbon sink , peat , mesocosm , temperate climate , greenhouse gas , global warming , hydrology (agriculture) , ecology , ecosystem , geography , engineering , cartography , geotechnical engineering , biology
Stress factors such as climate change and drought may switch the role of temperate peatlands from carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) sinks to sources, leading to positive feedback to global climate change. Water level management has been regarded as an important climate change mitigation strategy as it can sustain the natural net CO 2 sink function of a peatland. Little is known about how resilient peatlands are in the face of future climate change scenarios, as well as how effectively water level management can sustain the CO 2 sink function to mitigate global warming. The authors assess the effect of climate change on CO 2 exchange of south Swedish temperate peatlands, which were either unmanaged or subject to water level regulation. Climate chamber simulations were conducted using experimental peatland mesocosms exposed to current and future representative concentration pathway (RCP) climate scenarios (RCP 2.6, 4.5 and 8.5). The results showed that all managed and unmanaged systems under future climate scenarios could serve as CO 2 sinks throughout the experimental period. However, the 2018 extreme drought caused the unmanaged mesocosms under the RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 switch from a net CO 2 sink to a source during summer. Surprisingly, the unmanaged mesocosms under RCP 2.6 benefited from the warmer climate, and served as the best sink among the other unmanaged systems. Water level management had the greatest effect on the CO 2 sink function under RCP 8.5 and RCP 4.5, which improved their CO 2 sink capability up to six and two times, respectively. Under the current climate scenario, water level management had a negative effect on the CO 2 sink function, and it had almost no effect under RCP 2.6. Therefore, the researchers conclude that water level management is necessary for RCP 8.5, beneficial for RCP 4.5 and unimportant for RCP 2.6 and the current climate.