Premium
Assessment of yield gaps on global grazed‐only permanent pasture using climate binning
Author(s) -
Monteiro Leonardo A.,
Allee Andrew M.,
Campbell Eleanor E.,
Lynd Lee R.,
Soares Johnny R.,
Jaiswal Deepak,
Castro Oliveira Julianne,
Santos Vianna Murilo,
Morishige Ashley E.,
Figueiredo Gleyce K. D. A.,
Lamparelli Rubens A. C.,
Mueller Nathaniel D.,
Gerber James,
Cortez Luis A. B.,
Sheehan John J.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
global change biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.146
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1365-2486
pISSN - 1354-1013
DOI - 10.1111/gcb.14925
Subject(s) - pasture , livestock , productivity , agriculture , environmental science , agroforestry , grazing , agroecosystem , agronomy , agricultural productivity , geography , ecology , biology , forestry , economics , macroeconomics
To meet rising demands for agricultural products, existing agricultural lands must either produce more or expand in area. Yield gaps (YGs)—the difference between current and potential yield of agricultural systems—indicate the ability to increase output while holding land area constant. Here, we assess YGs in global grazed‐only permanent pasture lands using a climate binning approach. We create a snapshot of circa 2000 empirical yields for meat and milk production from cattle, sheep, and goats by sorting pastures into climate bins defined by total annual precipitation and growing degree‐days. We then estimate YGs from intra‐bin yield comparisons. We evaluate YG patterns across three FAO definitions of grazed livestock agroecosystems (arid, humid, and temperate), and groups of animal production systems that vary in animal types and animal products. For all subcategories of grazed‐only permanent pasture assessed, we find potential to increase productivity several‐fold over current levels. However, because productivity of grazed pasture systems is generally low, even large relative increases in yield translated to small absolute gains in global protein production. In our dataset, milk‐focused production systems were found to be seven times as productive as meat‐focused production systems regardless of animal type, while cattle were four times as productive as sheep and goats regardless of animal output type. Sustainable intensification of pasture is most promising for local development, where large relative increases in production can substantially increase incomes or “spare” large amounts of land for other uses. Our results motivate the need for further studies to target agroecological and economic limitations on productivity to improve YG estimates and identify sustainable pathways toward intensification.