z-logo
Premium
Trade‐offs between soil carbon sequestration and reactive nitrogen losses under straw return in global agroecosystems
Author(s) -
Xia Longlong,
Lam Shu Kee,
Wolf Benjamin,
Kiese Ralf,
Chen Deli,
ButterbachBahl Klaus
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
global change biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.146
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1365-2486
pISSN - 1354-1013
DOI - 10.1111/gcb.14466
Subject(s) - agroecosystem , carbon sequestration , environmental science , straw , reactive nitrogen , soil carbon , nitrogen , agronomy , agroforestry , agriculture , ecology , soil science , soil water , chemistry , biology , organic chemistry
It is widely recommended that crop straw be returned to croplands to maintain or increase soil carbon (C) storage in arable soils. However, because C and nitrogen (N) biogeochemical cycles are closely coupled, straw return may also affect soil reactive N (Nr) losses, but these effects remain uncertain, especially in terms of the interactions between soil C sequestration and Nr losses under straw addition. Here, we conducted a global meta‐analysis using 363 publications to assess the overall effects of straw return on soil Nr losses, C sequestration and crop productivity in agroecosystems. Our results show that on average, compared to mineral N fertilization, straw return with same amount of mineral N fertilizer significantly increased soil organic C (SOC) content (14.9%), crop yield (5.1%), and crop N uptake (10.9%). Moreover, Nr losses in the form of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions from rice paddies (17.3%), N leaching (8.7%), and runoff (25.6%) were significantly reduced, mainly due to enhanced microbial N immobilization. However, N 2 O emissions from upland fields (21.5%) and ammonia (NH 3 ) emissions (17.0%) significantly increased following straw return, mainly due to the stimulation of nitrification/denitrification and soil urease activity. The increase in NH 3 and N 2 O emissions was significantly and negatively correlated with straw C/N ratio and soil clay content. Regarding the interactions between C sequestration and Nr losses, the increase in SOC content following straw return was significantly and positively correlated with the decrease in N leaching and runoff. However, at a global scale, straw return increased net Nr losses from both rice and upland fields due to a greater stimulation of NH 3 emissions than the reduction in N leaching and runoff. The trade‐offs between increased net Nr losses and soil C sequestration highlight the importance of reasonably managing straw return to soils to limit NH 3 emissions without decreasing associated C sequestration potential.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom