z-logo
Premium
Unchanged carbon balance driven by equivalent responses of production and respiration to climate change in a mixed‐grass prairie
Author(s) -
Xu Xia,
Shi Zheng,
Chen Xuecheng,
Lin Yang,
Niu Shuli,
Jiang Lifen,
Luo Ruiseng,
Luo Yiqi
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
global change biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.146
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1365-2486
pISSN - 1354-1013
DOI - 10.1111/gcb.13192
Subject(s) - primary production , environmental science , ecosystem respiration , ecosystem , grassland , precipitation , climate change , global warming , atmospheric sciences , soil respiration , abiotic component , land use, land use change and forestry , ecology , soil water , land use , soil science , geography , biology , meteorology , geology
Responses of grassland carbon (C) cycling to climate change and land use remain a major uncertainty in model prediction of future climate. To explore the impacts of global change on ecosystem C fluxes and the consequent changes in C storage, we have conducted a field experiment with warming (+3 °C), altered precipitation (doubled and halved), and annual clipping at the end of growing seasons in a mixed‐grass prairie in Oklahoma, USA , from 2009 to 2013. Results showed that although ecosystem respiration ( ER ) and gross primary production ( GPP ) negatively responded to warming, net ecosystem exchange of CO 2 ( NEE ) did not significantly change under warming. Doubled precipitation stimulated and halved precipitation suppressed ER and GPP equivalently, with the net outcome being unchanged in NEE . These results indicate that warming and altered precipitation do not necessarily have profound impacts on ecosystem C storage. In addition, we found that clipping enhanced NEE due to a stronger positive response of GPP compared to ER , indicating that clipping could potentially be an effective land practice that could increase C storage. No significant interactions between warming, altered precipitation, and clipping were observed. Meanwhile, we found that belowground net primary production ( BNPP ) in general was sensitive to climate change and land use though no significant changes were found in NPP across treatments. Moreover, negative correlations of the ER / GPP ratio with soil temperature and moisture did not differ across treatments, highlighting the roles of abiotic factors in mediating ecosystem C fluxes in this grassland. Importantly, our results suggest that belowground C cycling (e.g., BNPP ) could respond to climate change with no alterations in ecosystem C storage in the same period.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here