Premium
Soil carbon sequestration and biochar as negative emission technologies
Author(s) -
Smith Pete
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
global change biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.146
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1365-2486
pISSN - 1354-1013
DOI - 10.1111/gcb.13178
Subject(s) - biochar , carbon sequestration , environmental science , greenhouse gas , slash and char , bio energy with carbon capture and storage , carbon sink , soil carbon , climate change mitigation , soil organic matter , soil water , climate change , soil science , carbon dioxide , waste management , ecology , engineering , pyrolysis , biology
Despite 20 years of effort to curb emissions, greenhouse gas ( GHG ) emissions grew faster during the 2000s than in the 1990s, which presents a major challenge for meeting the international goal of limiting warming to <2 °C relative to the preindustrial era. Most recent scenarios from integrated assessment models require large‐scale deployment of negative emissions technologies ( NET s) to reach the 2 °C target. A recent analysis of NET s, including direct air capture, enhanced weathering, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage and afforestation/deforestation, showed that all NET s have significant limits to implementation, including economic cost, energy requirements, land use, and water use. In this paper, I assess the potential for negative emissions from soil carbon sequestration and biochar addition to land, and also the potential global impacts on land use, water, nutrients, albedo, energy and cost. Results indicate that soil carbon sequestration and biochar have useful negative emission potential (each 0.7 GtCeq. yr −1 ) and that they potentially have lower impact on land, water use, nutrients, albedo, energy requirement and cost, so have fewer disadvantages than many NET s. Limitations of soil carbon sequestration as a NET centre around issues of sink saturation and reversibility. Biochar could be implemented in combination with bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. Current integrated assessment models do not represent soil carbon sequestration or biochar. Given the negative emission potential of SCS and biochar and their potential advantages compared to other NET s, efforts should be made to include these options within IAM s, so that their potential can be explored further in comparison with other NET s for climate stabilization.